Your Co-Heirs Get First Refusal Before You Sell an Inherited Share

On 14 July 2026 the Supreme Court held that Section 22 of the Hindu Succession Act reaches inherited agricultural land, not just houses and flats. If you inherited property with your siblings and one of you wants to sell out to an outsider, the others have a statutory right to buy that share first.

What the court decided

The case is Mahinder & Others v. Puran Singh, 2026 INSC 698, decided by Justices Sanjay Karol and N Kotiswar Singh.

Section 22 of the Hindu Succession Act says that where an interest in any immovable property of a person who died without a will passes to two or more Class-I heirs, and one of those heirs proposes to transfer their interest, the other heirs have a preferential right to acquire it. If the two sides cannot agree a price, the court where the property sits fixes it. If two heirs both want the share, the higher offer wins.

The question was whether that right reaches agricultural land. The court said yes. It called the right "an incident of succession and nothing more," which places it inside Parliament's power over succession rather than inside state pre-emption law.

The facts are worth reading, because the timeline is the lesson. Siblings inherited agricultural land from their father as Class-I heirs. On 8 December 2011 one brother filed to exercise his preferential right under Section 22. Twenty days later, on 28 December 2011, seven of the co-heirs sold their shares to a third party regardless. The civil court in Karnal threw the suit out, treating Section 22 as the same animal as Section 15 of the Punjab Pre-emption Act, which the Supreme Court had struck down in Atam Prakash v. State of Haryana back in 1986. The first appellate court reversed that. The High Court found no substantial question of law. The Supreme Court dismissed the last appeal and settled the point.

On Atam Prakash the court was blunt. That case struck down the Punjab provision on Article 14 grounds and "neither examined nor decided the validity of Section 22." Reading one into the other, the bench warned, would "invite a situation of judicially created anarchy."

Be honest about what is new here

Not much, and that is the point.

Babu Ram v. Santokh Singh (2019) already held that Section 22 applies to agricultural land. This ruling affirms Babu Ram and shuts a door that lower courts kept reopening by borrowing Atam Prakash. The value here is certainty, not novelty. Anyone selling you this as a brand-new right is selling you something.

The court also drew the boundary tight: "No tenant, no distant blood relation, no co-owner can invoke Section 22." The right belongs to Class-I heirs inheriting from the same intestate. Nobody else gets to use it.

What it means if you own inherited property from abroad

Two directions, and both bite.

If your family in India wants to sell and you do not, you have a first right to buy their share before it goes to a stranger. You do not have to watch an outsider buy into your father's land. Section 22 is a shield.

If you are the one who wants out, you have to offer your share to your co-heirs before you sell to an outsider. Section 22 is also a leash. The same provision that protects you constrains you.

The agricultural-land point lands on NRIs harder than on residents. An NRI cannot buy agricultural land in India. An NRI can inherit it. Inherited farmland is one of the few situations where an NRI holds agricultural land at all, and this ruling governs that exact situation.

Timing decided this case. The brother won because he asserted his right on 8 December, before the sale deed was executed on 28 December. He moved first. That is the whole difference between a shield and a grievance.

What to do

We report the ruling. We do not run your succession litigation.

If your co-heirs are deadlocked, the mechanics are in the co-heir deadlock guide. If you are still working out what you inherited and how it is held, start with inheriting property in India as an NRI. If you are assembling proof of heirship, read succession certificate versus legal heir certificate.

This sits alongside the June ruling that heirs take a father's self-acquired property as tenants-in-common. Read together: one co-heir cannot sell the whole property, and cannot sell even their own share to an outsider without offering it to you first.

FAQ

Does Section 22 apply to a flat, or only to farmland? It applies to any immovable property of a person who died without a will, which includes a flat. The 14 July 2026 ruling settled the narrower question of whether it also reaches agricultural land. It does.

Can my brother sell his share of our inherited flat to a stranger without telling me? Section 22 gives the other Class-I heirs a preferential right to acquire the share he proposes to transfer. The right has to be asserted. In the case the Supreme Court decided, the heir who won had filed before the sale deed was executed.

Who fixes the price if we cannot agree? The court within whose jurisdiction the property sits, under Section 22(2). If two Class-I heirs both want the share, the one offering the higher consideration is preferred under Section 22(3).

Own inherited property in India and cannot get the family aligned?

66 MG Road keeps NRI co-owners straight on what the law hands them and what it asks of them, so a family sale does not turn into a decade in court. We operate in Mumbai, Pune, Bangalore, Hyderabad, Chennai, and Gurgaon. Read the co-heir deadlock guide or request a proposal.

66 MG Road newsdesk

Sources